HomeLawyersStaffPracticeContact

Main

February 08, 2007

Town of Harrietstown

OFFICIALS GEAR UP FOR FIRE ADVISORY BOARD MEETING:

Representatives from the village of Saranac Lake, several area towns and the Saranac Lake Volunteer Fire Department met on Wednesday at the Harrietstown Town Hall in an effort to make sure that the newly created fire advisory board gets off to a smooth start when it meets for the first time next week. ... The fire advisory board was a condition of a memorandum of understanding that was included in the fire contract agreed upon between the village and the six towns in January. The MOU states that the board must be in place by March 1. ... The fire advisory board will consist of nine voting members, officials agreed Wednesday. That breaks down to one per municipality, plus two for the fire department. The fire department’s two voting members must include one member of the rescue squad and one from the fire department. Rescue Chief Vernon James and Second Assistant Fire Chief Dave Bickford have already been appointed to those positions.

James suggested the fire department have two members because the rescue and fire squads operate differently and one person wouldn’t be able to answer all the questions.
...
In recent years, the village has attempted to move to an assessment-based formula, while the towns have preferred a per-call formula, similar to the one that’s been used in recent years. Although, there have been suggestions made to alter it.

The representatives also agreed to continue to petition state representatives to pass legislation that would allow the fire department to bill for ambulance calls. Currently, municipal law doesn’t allow fire department-based ambulance service to bill for services.

January 31, 2007

Intermunicipal Cooperation

LOCAL LEADERS DISCUSS GREATER COOPERATION, SHARING OF SERVICES:

Representatives from Ilion, German Flatts, Mohawk, Frankfort, Herkimer and the county gathered at Ilion Municipal Hall to engage in the first of what may be many discussions about sharing services and combining efforts for the greater good of local communities.

Thirteen local officials got together to brainstorm ideas for collaboration between villages, townships and the county Tuesday night, suggesting things from sharing personnel to sharing equipment and supplies, to sharing services such as fire and police departments.

“The only thing that separates us on a map is an ink line,” Ilion Mayor Mark Cushman said. “We share the same concerns, the same challenges the same experiences and the same expertise. I want to come out of here tonight with an idea. I don't care if it only saves us a dime. We need to get into the spirit of collaboration.”
...
While ideas ranged from grand to small, officials walked away from the meeting with three definite goals: Look into bulk purchases of water treatment chemicals, reform the economic development alliance between the municipalities, and begin exploring the procurement of resources through the county.

January 23, 2007

Intermunicipal Cooperation in Tompkins County

COUNTY MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS FORM COUNCIL TO TACKLE COMMON ISSUES:

Tompkins County's municipal leaders have formally teamed up to discuss their challenging local government issues.

In a new association called The Tompkins County Council of Governments or TCCOG, all of the county's municipalities including the City of Ithaca, the towns of Caroline, Danby, Dryden, Enfield, Groton, Ithaca, Lansing and Ulysses, and the villages of Cayuga Heights, Dryden, Freeville, Groton and Trumansburg, will meet on a monthly basis to discuss and recommend “non-binding” resolutions for “more efficient and fiscally responsible delivery of government services,” according to a county press release.
...
Barber said one of the primary focuses for TCCOG will be reducing health insurance costs.

“Some areas, like the city and county, have large pools and can get much better rates,” Barber said. “We're looking at ways to put everybody together in one big pool and reduce costs to the smaller municipalities while not increasing costs to the larger ones.”

With that in mind, the council also has requested about $266,000 in state grant support under the Department of State's Shared Municipal Services Initiative Program, Austic said.

If the grant money is awarded, it will likely go toward trying to hire a consultant who specializes in health insurance, Barber said.

July 14, 2006

Town of Plattsburgh

CITY, TOWN WORKING TOWARD WASTEWATER TREATMENT:

The City of Plattsburgh and the Town of Plattsburgh are working toward a 33-year agreement on wastewater treatment.

At a news conference Thursday, Town Supervisor Bernie Bassett said, "By working together, each municipality will save money and provide a more efficient and effective solution to connect and repair water lines located in both the town and city on former PARC property."

CHARGES
The two sides are looking at an agreement that would see the city charge the town $2.55 per 1,000 gallons of wastewater treated at the city plant.

The city charges town residents $3.05 per 1,000 gallons. The last contract between the two municipalities expired June 16, 2002.

Bassett said the memorandum ends the town's pursuit of a $15 million wastewater-treatment plant near the end of Benny Blake Road, which would have discharged into the Saranac River.

"This is a better option, because anytime you don't have to generate debt, you have to look at that," Bassett said.

The city benefits because it is no longer faced with losing its largest customer.

The town benefits because rates would be locked in for 33 years and they are about the same as the town would achieve by building its own plant, without having to build that plant.

June 22, 2006

Erie County Road Patrols

MUNICIPALITIES RESIST BILLS FOR ROAD PATROLS:

Towns and villages are preparing an answer for the county executive who wants them to pay for sheriff's road patrols.

The answer is No.

"We are not paying for road patrol. It's a double tax on the residents," Elma Supervisor Michael P. Nolan said.

Erie County Executive Joel A. Giambra sent a letter to 20 towns and villages and the Seneca Nation of Indians telling them to pay their share of $5.9 million for road patrols next year or go without the sheriff's service. Each community's share is based on the number of calls logged in the town over the last two years, plus 5.25 percent for inflation.

...

Both sides seem to expect the issue will wind up in court. The communities maintain that the sheriff is constitutionally required to protect them, and the county executive says road patrols are not mandated.

Towns also say that it is not fair to charge them for their use of patrol services, if other towns are not charged for their use of Central Police Services, the Holding Center, libraries, roads, parks and other services.
...

Clarence's full bill for the sheriff's patrols would be about $1 million, and Supervisor Kathleen E. Hallock says the town is opposed to paying.

"We do feel it is the duty of the sheriff to provide safety," she said. "I believe the towns are united in this."

Not so, says Giambra.

"There are towns that pay to have that service provided, and we're hearing from those who pay who are saying it's not fair," Giambra said.

He said towns and villages have been given a windfall in sales tax revenue and want free road patrols but do not want county taxes to increase.

April 25, 2006

Chautauqua County

JUDICIAL MERGERS A HOT TOPIC IN CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY:

When most people think of a courtroom, they don’t envision a small corner office — but that’s exactly where Judge Art Thomas holds court.

His chambers in the North Harmony town hall are no bigger than a good-sized closet. Defendants waiting to argue speeding tickets or noise violations sit in chairs scattered throughout the building’s common space, like middle schoolers waiting to see the principal.

‘‘We’ve always called ourself the court closest to the people,’’ Thomas said with a smile.

And it is, literally. Defendants sit just feet away from him in brightly colored plastic chairs in front of his desk, flanked by newspaper clippings and photos cluttered on Thomas’ wall. Small as it is, the setting of his court has changed dramatically since he became town judge in 1964 and sessions were held in his home.

When proposals to merge small town courts come up every few years, Thomas’ follows the developments, cutting out newspaper articles and adding them to a scrapbook. The idea, which Thomas said ‘‘comes up about every seven years,’’ has again resurfaced with renewed efforts to merge neighboring town courts.

Assemblyman Bill Parment, D-North Harmony, has introduced a bill that would allow two or more contiguous towns to form a combined court. The law currently allows only two neighboring towns to merge courts.
...
According to William Coughlin, county public defender, merging some town courts could save money in cost of transporting prisoners to trial and reduce the amount of assistant public defenders needed to cover the courts.

‘‘In the past three years, the (state) Office of Court Administration has created more courts within the existing courts,’’ Coughlin said. ‘‘You have drug courts now in Jamestown and Dunkirk and a drug court in Family Court, just to name a few. Each time they open a new court, that gives another clerk I have to send a public defender to and the district attorney has to send someone to.’’

In 2005, Chautauqua County paid nine assistant public defenders and one second assistant public defender $370,707 in salary and benefits. Four first assistant district attorneys and eight assistant district attorneys made a combined $559,412.

According to Coughlin, merging courts could allow the Public Defender’s office to make assistants full-time, bringing reductions in staff and post-retirement benefits.

‘‘One reason we have as many public defenders as we are required to have is because we have too many courts to cover,’’ Coughlin said. ‘‘If you were to consolidate courts, I may not need as many public defenders because you’d be in one location.’’

District Attorney David Foley said a merger wouldn’t necessarily cut down on the number of assistants who visit town courts. The towns of Mina, Sherman, Clymer and French Creek hold calendar calls at different times on the same night, so the district attorneys and public defenders only have to make one trip.
...
While Parment’s legislation will allow towns to join together to merge court facilities, many officials have advocated going a step further to create district courts regulated by the state Office of Court Administration.

In 1978, the county’s comprehensive plan proposed replacing local courts in the Jamestown urban area with a general district court. The plan would have left rural courts unchanged because merging these would mean greater travel distances in areas already lacking adequate public transportation.

In 1996, the Southern Tier West Regional Development Board conducted a feasibility study for merging courts in the area known as Metro 6 — the city of Jamestown, towns of Busti and Ellicott, and villages of Celoron, Lakewood and Falconer. A committee with representatives from each community spent months studying the court systems, including costs and duplications.

The study found establishing a district court would reduce per-capita costs because the state would foot the bill for the courts’ operation and administration. These courts would require licensed attorneys to serve as justices and operate full-time, five days a week, which the report said would bring ‘‘a high level of legal sophistication and professionalism.’’

Success in consolidating would depend largely on how willing residents and political leaders would be to change the current system, the report found.

‘‘The indications seemed to be, from a cost standpoint, at the time there was a rationale for doing that, but there didn’t seem to be the political interest in doing that,’’ said Eric Bridges, a consolidation expert with Southern Tier West.

The local Magistrates Association came out against this merger.

‘‘It’s that nasty c-word — change,’’ Bridges said. ‘‘What we were proposing was dramatic, would make big changes in the way towns provide services.’’

April 20, 2006

Shared Services Grants

The Press-Republican has this editorial today about shared services, but also breaks some news (to me at least) about how this year's proposed state budget treats the Share Municipal Services Incentive (SMSI) grant program that debuted last year:

State Sen. Betty Little has made great headway in her effort to get local governments to share services and save money for their taxpayers. A fund set aside to help municipalities do so has been increased in this year's budget from $2.75 million to $25 million.

Sharing services makes more and more sense every year. It has long been a goal of responsible government to try to either share services or merge outright in the interest of saving money. Why pay twice for the same service, or why pay more people than are needed to perform what could be done more efficiently, with fewer workers?
...
Last year's state program, which provides grants for municipalities to find ways to consolidate services, saw 260 applications.

The legislature approved increasing the availability of funds this year almost tenfold. Gov. Pataki had included that amount in his budget, so the program is sure of appropriation.

Of the $25 million, a minimum of $5.5 million will be devoted to expanding existing Shared Municipal Services program grants; $4 million for local highway-service grants; $4.5 million for local employee-health-insurance-incentive grants; $1 million for countywide shared-service plans; and $10 million for municipal-consolidation-incentive funding.

Another $700,000 will be allocated for the creation of a statewide databank of inter-municipal agreements to provide legal and technical assistance on all levels of agreement

UPDATE: Here's some clarification on the machinations of budget-making in Albany from a reader who's familiar with the process: the SMSI program was vetoed by Governor Pataki (along with many other line-items) for constitutional reasons, but since he had included it in his Executive Budget in a slightly different form, the program likely will be restored after further negotiation with the Legislature.

April 13, 2006

Town of Amherst

FOR MOHAN, A MYSTERIOUS 5 GRAND:

How popular is Amherst Supervisor Satish B. Mohan? Apparently $5,000 worth.

That's how much an anonymous admirer mailed to Mohan on Friday - in $100 bills.

The money, enclosed in a plain brown envelope, was wrapped in a note to Mohan saying: "We like what you are doing," officials said Tuesday.

"We were told that's never happened before," Mohan said.

"I never heard of anybody sending 50 $100 bills in an envelope. That's unbelievable," said Town Clerk Susan K. Jaros, who was summoned to the supervisor's office when the money was discovered.

"They wanted to know if this had ever happened before," Jaros said. "We went and got rubber gloves. Nobody wanted to touch any of it."

The envelope and the note were addressed to Mohan, but he was in a meeting when the mail arrived, so he was not present when it was opened.
...
The note also directed that the bills be deposited in the Highway Department's account, a fact that Highway Superintendent Robert Anderson took as a vote of confidence. "It makes me feel great," Anderson said.
...
Since his upset election victory last November, Mohan has attracted widespread support both inside and outside Amherst. A soft-spoken University at Buffalo engineering professor, Mohan, 70, is a native of India who came to this country about 30 years ago to attend graduate school.

In announcing his first run for public office, Mohan explained that he was entering the campaign to give something back to the town where he reared and educated his family.

Mohan's office receives dozens of messages daily, most of them from well-wishers. He said he was pleased with the cash gift because "people are supporting us in any way they can."

April 12, 2006

District Courts

I rarely post news from my home county because the two newspapers here provide web access only by subscription. The above-the-fold article in today's Jamestown Post-Journal- MERGING LOCAL COURTS- merits a mention, however, even without a link. The Democrats in the Chautauqua County Legislature have floated a trial balloon for a proposal to consolidate in one form or another 33 town, village, and city courts in the county into district courts. The article is short on detail, there is no formal proposal yet, and I can confirm that at least four of the towns in the county have not been consulted about it at all. Nevertheless, this is an idea that I've mentioned to some of my clients and I would hope, that, if nothing else, perhaps a test court could be established to confirm that it would in fact save money without hindering the effectiveness of the judicial system. We'll see. [Update: I understand that district courts exist on Long Island and one was recently formed in Broome County, and, by all appearances they make sense in that suburban setting- my question is whether they would be cost-effective in rural areas.]

March 31, 2006

Erie County

PLAN TO MAKE TOWNS PAY FOR ROAD PATROLS MOVES AHEAD:

County Executive Joel A. Giambra next month will tell towns relying primarily on the Sheriff's Department for police protection that they must start paying for the service in 2007.

His letter is likely to again incite protests from certain town leaders, who will argue that police protection is one of the few county services they receive. They have an ally in Sheriff Timothy B. Howard, who ran for election in 2005 as a critic of the idea.

The County Legislature last year agreed to start charging for road patrols in 2007. So far, there is no indication that this year's Legislature will back away, even though nine of the 15 members are new to office.

"The message will be a fairly firm one," said James M. Hartman, Giambra's point man on efforts to cut costs and avoid a tax increase for 2007. "They will have to either enter into a contract with the Sheriff's Department, or they will lose the service."

The Legislature agreed to phase in the $5.4 million cost of road patrols over three years, so towns could be charged a total of $1.8 million next year. Hartman said the money will be collected or the road patrol budget will be trimmed accordingly.
...
The issue of towns paying for Sheriff's Department patrols has been around for years, and Giambra revived it when laying groundwork for the 2005 budget. Then-Sheriff Patrick M. Gallivan responded by saying road patrols were not a luxury, as Giambra's budget director termed them, but "a vital service taxpayers pay for."

About 15 towns rely primarily on the Sheriff's Department for police protection. Clarence is one of the largest.

"I have alerted my Town Board about it," said Supervisor Kathleen E. Hallock. "We will address it once again," she said, but she doubted that Giambra's letter would be met with an acquiescence to pay the fee or to create a Clarence police department.